Discussion:
Software switch for embedded device
Itamar Reis Peixoto
2011-12-07 19:10:47 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Arik Raffael Funke <***@funke.eu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has anybody compared the different options for software switches for
> embedded devices? (My primary constraint is available RAM.)
>
> My intuition would be that callweaver is less memory hungry than
> asterisk. (Based on my information about asterisk from when callweaver
> first appeared: different callplan management, no inbuilt CLI.)
>
> However this I am not sure that is / was true. Also what about freeswitch?
>
> Many thanks,
> Arik
>

I think callweaver development is stalled, you probably should use
opensips, asterisk or other solution.



--
------------

Itamar Reis Peixoto
msn, google talk: ***@ispbrasil.com.br
+55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP)
+55 34 9158 9329 (TIM)
+55 34 8806 3989 (OI)
+55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG)
Meftah Tayeb
2011-12-06 17:39:14 UTC
Permalink
http://www.freeswitch.org

----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Reis Peixoto" <***@ispbrasil.com.br>
To: "Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<callweaver-***@callweaver.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Callweaver-users] Software switch for embedded device


> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Arik Raffael Funke <***@funke.eu> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> has anybody compared the different options for software switches for
>> embedded devices? (My primary constraint is available RAM.)
>>
>> My intuition would be that callweaver is less memory hungry than
>> asterisk. (Based on my information about asterisk from when callweaver
>> first appeared: different callplan management, no inbuilt CLI.)
>>
>> However this I am not sure that is / was true. Also what about
>> freeswitch?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Arik
>>
>
> I think callweaver development is stalled, you probably should use
> opensips, asterisk or other solution.
>
>
>
> --
> ------------
>
> Itamar Reis Peixoto
> msn, google talk: ***@ispbrasil.com.br
> +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP)
> +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM)
> +55 34 8806 3989 (OI)
> +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG)
> _______________________________________________
> Callweaver-users mailing list
> Callweaver-***@callweaver.org
> http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 6691 (20111207) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6691 (20111207) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
clive engelberg
2011-12-08 16:32:41 UTC
Permalink
Hi

I would also look at freeswitch if I was in your situation.

kol tov
Clive



On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:39:14 +0200 "Meftah Tayeb" <***@gmail.com> wrote

> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Itamar Reis Peixoto" <***@ispbrasil.com.br>
> To: "Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> <callweaver-***@callweaver.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 9:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Callweaver-users] Software switch for embedded device
>
>
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Arik Raffael Funke <***@funke.eu> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> has anybody compared the different options for software switches for
> >> embedded devices? (My primary constraint is available RAM.)
> >>
> >> My intuition would be that callweaver is less memory hungry than
> >> asterisk. (Based on my information about asterisk from when callweaver
> >> first appeared: different callplan management, no inbuilt CLI.)
> >>
> >> However this I am not sure that is / was true. Also what about
> >> freeswitch?
> >>
> >> Many thanks,
> >> Arik
> >>
> >
> > I think callweaver development is stalled, you probably should use
> > opensips, asterisk or other solution.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ------------
> >
> > Itamar Reis Peixoto
> > msn, google talk: ***@ispbrasil.com.br
> > +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP)
> > +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM)
> > +55 34 8806 3989 (OI)
> > +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Callweaver-users mailing list
> > Callweaver-***@callweaver.org
> > http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 6691 (20111207) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 6691 (20111207) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callweaver-users mailing list
> Callweaver-***@callweaver.org
> http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users



____________________________________________________________
South Africas premier free email service - www.webmail.co.za

For super low premiums, click here. http://www.dialdirect.co.za/?vdn=15828
Meftah Tayeb
2011-12-07 15:28:05 UTC
Permalink
+1 Cliv

----- Original Message -----
From: "clive engelberg" <***@webmail.co.za>
To: "Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<callweaver-***@callweaver.org>; "Meftah Tayeb" <***@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Callweaver-users] Software switch for embedded device


> Hi
>
> I would also look at freeswitch if I was in your situation.
>
> kol tov
> Clive
>
>
>
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:39:14 +0200 "Meftah Tayeb" <***@gmail.com>
> wrote
>
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Itamar Reis Peixoto" <***@ispbrasil.com.br>
>> To: "Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
>> <callweaver-***@callweaver.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 9:10 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Callweaver-users] Software switch for embedded device
>>
>>
>> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Arik Raffael Funke <***@funke.eu>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> has anybody compared the different options for software switches for
>> >> embedded devices? (My primary constraint is available RAM.)
>> >>
>> >> My intuition would be that callweaver is less memory hungry than
>> >> asterisk. (Based on my information about asterisk from when callweaver
>> >> first appeared: different callplan management, no inbuilt CLI.)
>> >>
>> >> However this I am not sure that is / was true. Also what about
>> >> freeswitch?
>> >>
>> >> Many thanks,
>> >> Arik
>> >>
>> >
>> > I think callweaver development is stalled, you probably should use
>> > opensips, asterisk or other solution.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > ------------
>> >
>> > Itamar Reis Peixoto
>> > msn, google talk: ***@ispbrasil.com.br
>> > +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP)
>> > +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM)
>> > +55 34 8806 3989 (OI)
>> > +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG)
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Callweaver-users mailing list
>> > Callweaver-***@callweaver.org
>> > http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
>> >
>> >
>> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>> > signature database 6691 (20111207) __________
>> >
>> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>> >
>> > http://www.eset.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>> signature
>> database 6691 (20111207) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Callweaver-users mailing list
>> Callweaver-***@callweaver.org
>> http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> South Africas premier free email service - www.webmail.co.za
> For super low premiums, click here. http://www.dialdirect.co.za/?vdn=15828
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 6694 (20111208) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6694 (20111208) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
Arik Raffael Funke
2011-12-23 10:22:42 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

Quite a few people have voted for freeswitch. I am surprised by this.
From what I can see it focuses on exploiting multi-core machines etc.

My hardware is quite the opposite: about 16MB filesystem, 300 MHz
non-Intel compatible CPU and 64 MB RAM. - Is freeswitch still a good
option? (Also I need ISDN support (inkl. NT mode) via CAPI.)

Can anybody point me to an article on running freeswitch on comparable
devices?

Many thanks for all the help so far.

- Arik


On 07/12/2011 16:28, Meftah Tayeb wrote:
> +1 Cliv
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "clive engelberg"<***@webmail.co.za>
> To: "Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> <callweaver-***@callweaver.org>; "Meftah Tayeb"<***@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 6:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [Callweaver-users] Software switch for embedded device
>
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I would also look at freeswitch if I was in your situation.
>>
>> kol tov
>> Clive
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:39:14 +0200 "Meftah Tayeb"<***@gmail.com>
>> wrote
>>
>>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Itamar Reis Peixoto"<***@ispbrasil.com.br>
>>> To: "Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
>>> <callweaver-***@callweaver.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 9:10 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Callweaver-users] Software switch for embedded device
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Arik Raffael Funke<***@funke.eu>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> has anybody compared the different options for software switches for
>>>>> embedded devices? (My primary constraint is available RAM.)
>>>>>
>>>>> My intuition would be that callweaver is less memory hungry than
>>>>> asterisk. (Based on my information about asterisk from when callweaver
>>>>> first appeared: different callplan management, no inbuilt CLI.)
>>>>>
>>>>> However this I am not sure that is / was true. Also what about
>>>>> freeswitch?
>>>>>
>>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>> Arik
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think callweaver development is stalled, you probably should use
>>>> opensips, asterisk or other solution.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ------------
>>>>
>>>> Itamar Reis Peixoto
>>>> msn, google talk: ***@ispbrasil.com.br
>>>> +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP)
>>>> +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM)
>>>> +55 34 8806 3989 (OI)
>>>> +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG)
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Callweaver-users mailing list
>>>> Callweaver-***@callweaver.org
>>>> http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>>>> signature database 6691 (20111207) __________
>>>>
>>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>>> signature
>>> database 6691 (20111207) __________
>>>
>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Callweaver-users mailing list
>>> Callweaver-***@callweaver.org
>>> http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> South Africas premier free email service - www.webmail.co.za
>> For super low premiums, click here. http://www.dialdirect.co.za/?vdn=15828
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>> signature database 6694 (20111208) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6694 (20111208) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
clive engelberg
2011-12-25 13:23:45 UTC
Permalink
Arik

Hi. Freeswitch is very economic on cpu, so I would recommend it.

The only thing is that freeswitch does not support CAPI. You may need to
purchase a sangoma or digium BRI interface for your ISDN line. Maybe a Patton
or quintum BRI gateway is a good alternative.

Check the freeswitch wiki for documentation.

Good luck,.
Clive




On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:22:42 +0100 Arik Raffael Funke <***@funke.eu> wrote

> Hi,
>
> Quite a few people have voted for freeswitch. I am surprised by this.
> From what I can see it focuses on exploiting multi-core machines etc.
>
> My hardware is quite the opposite: about 16MB filesystem, 300 MHz
> non-Intel compatible CPU and 64 MB RAM. - Is freeswitch still a good
> option? (Also I need ISDN support (inkl. NT mode) via CAPI.)
>
> Can anybody point me to an article on running freeswitch on comparable
> devices?
>
> Many thanks for all the help so far.
>
> - Arik
>
>
> On 07/12/2011 16:28, Meftah Tayeb wrote:
> > +1 Cliv
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "clive engelberg"<***@webmail.co.za>
> > To: "Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> > <callweaver-***@callweaver.org>; "Meftah Tayeb"<***@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 6:32 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Callweaver-users] Software switch for embedded device
> >
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I would also look at freeswitch if I was in your situation.
> >>
> >> kol tov
> >> Clive
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:39:14 +0200 "Meftah Tayeb"<***@gmail.com>
> >> wrote
> >>
> >>> http://www.freeswitch.org
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Itamar Reis Peixoto"<***@ispbrasil.com.br>
> >>> To: "Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> >>> <callweaver-***@callweaver.org>
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 9:10 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [Callweaver-users] Software switch for embedded device
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Arik Raffael Funke<***@funke.eu>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> has anybody compared the different options for software switches for
> >>>>> embedded devices? (My primary constraint is available RAM.)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My intuition would be that callweaver is less memory hungry than
> >>>>> asterisk. (Based on my information about asterisk from when callweaver
> >>>>> first appeared: different callplan management, no inbuilt CLI.)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> However this I am not sure that is / was true. Also what about
> >>>>> freeswitch?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Many thanks,
> >>>>> Arik
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I think callweaver development is stalled, you probably should use
> >>>> opensips, asterisk or other solution.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> ------------
> >>>>
> >>>> Itamar Reis Peixoto
> >>>> msn, google talk: ***@ispbrasil.com.br
> >>>> +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP)
> >>>> +55 34 9158 9329 (TIM)
> >>>> +55 34 8806 3989 (OI)
> >>>> +55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG)
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Callweaver-users mailing list
> >>>> Callweaver-***@callweaver.org
> >>>> http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> >>>> signature database 6691 (20111207) __________
> >>>>
> >>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.eset.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> >>> signature
> >>> database 6691 (20111207) __________
> >>>
> >>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >>>
> >>> http://www.eset.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Callweaver-users mailing list
> >>> Callweaver-***@callweaver.org
> >>> http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ____________________________________________________________
> >> South Africas premier free email service - www.webmail.co.za
> >> For super low premiums, click here.
http://www.dialdirect.co.za/?vdn=15828
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> >> signature database 6694 (20111208) __________
> >>
> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >>
> >> http://www.eset.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> > signature database 6694 (20111208) __________ >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callweaver-users mailing list
> Callweaver-***@callweaver.org
> http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users



____________________________________________________________
South Africas premier free email service - www.webmail.co.za

For super low premiums, click here. http://www.dialdirect.co.za/?vdn=15828
Loading...